The Criminal Acts and Violations of Law Exclusions apply to bar coverage for the Underlying Lawsuit because there was a finding in a lawsuit related to the Underlying Lawsuit captioned TOMA Integrity, Inc., et al. v. Windermere Oaks Water Supply Corporation, Case No. 47531, filed in the 33rd District Court of Burnet County, Texas (the “TOMA Action”) that the WSC board violated the Texas Open Meetings Act (“TOMA”) by not providing public notice to the WSC members in connection with the meeting discussing the sale of the airport tract to Martin and by not listing any items on the agenda for that meeting. Further, that finding is a “final adjudication” as required under the Criminal Acts Exclusion because after the trial court in the TOMA Action issued its order finding that WSC violated TOMA, WSC did not challenge the trial court’s order. The plaintiffs did appeal, however, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to void the WSC board’s actions in light of the TOMA violation. Nonetheless, the appellate court affirmed the trial court’s order that the WSC board violated TOMA, but that it would not void the board’s actions and entered a judgment on June 21, 2019 stating same.